|
Post by <T|F|B>The Shadow on Aug 19, 2019 10:30:00 GMT -5
In light of the fact I had not previously made a firm rule on if an opponent does not show up to a match I am asking the opinion of the clan on how to handle the outcome of Moo vs Sinpy.
After discussing with Sheep, we felt that due to the fact Moo was busy/unavailable within the time-frame of round 1 we had previously listed (Aug 11-14), and had not responded since, we would just automatically pass Sinpy to the next round. However, it is perhaps best if everyone here has a say first, so if you feel we must wait on a match vote accordingly.
The outcome of this vote which will end Aug 21 will be the official decision.
NOTE: Sinpy has been notified not to vote on this decision as the match concerns him.
|
|
|
Post by <T|F|B>Motleycristo on Aug 19, 2019 17:41:47 GMT -5
Pass Sinpy. I wanna see him floating around the Tournament battlefields to the awe of everyone watching.
|
|
|
Post by <T|F|B>Motleycristo on Aug 20, 2019 3:09:27 GMT -5
Plus, your human rules mean nothing to me!
|
|
|
Post by <T|ƒ|B> Le Mouton Noir on Aug 20, 2019 19:35:44 GMT -5
3rd option: regio vs sinpy !!!
just kidding ...or not?
|
|
|
Post by <T|F|B>The Shadow on Aug 21, 2019 14:13:54 GMT -5
Picking Monterrey is not fair to the others who did not get a second chance in the tournament like Urkine and Motley. One time elimination
As according to the votes we shall wait for Moo to be available.
|
|
|
Post by <T|F|B>Monterrey(mex) on Sept 14, 2019 20:23:21 GMT -5
Hi. Hey shadow, I was thinking that you could do an FFA (Free for all) could be done among all the losers including wanger and whoever won (with the highest score) would take the place of moo in the tournament. With this we could forget about wasting time in making consolation duels as the 5th and 6th place.
A free for all between Urkine, Monterrey, wanger and motley and the winner takes the place of moo.
It would be another opportunity for losers. I don't know what they think.
|
|
|
Post by <T|F|B>The Shadow on Sept 14, 2019 20:55:56 GMT -5
I think this is a good idea Monterrey, I'll try to find out when we could arrange this possibly Saturday September 28.
|
|
|
Post by <T|ƒ|B> Le Mouton Noir on Sept 15, 2019 12:24:10 GMT -5
Good idea, but what would happend with 3rd place match?
|
|
|
Post by <T|F|B>Monterrey(mex) on Sept 15, 2019 13:30:02 GMT -5
Easy:
If Wanger wins the FFA and loses vs Sinpy, then he will play third place (since he went to the semifinals and I think he deserves it).
If wanger does not win the FFA, then wanger will also play third place.
If wanger wins in the semifinals and advances to the final, there will be the place of wanger of the other open key, then I propose that there be a duel between sinpy (so that he also has his chance) and the second place of the FFA, the one that wins He will play for third place.
If wanger loses in the semifinals, then wanger is given third place for reaching the semifinals twice and having won the FFA of the losers.
Wanger would be assured of playing third place no matter what, and I think he is deserved because he was the only one of the "losers" who went to the semifinals. This would be the fairest thing for me.
|
|